Castor EDC Alternatives

Compare Castor EDC alternatives: EDC and clinical trial software with eConsent, ePRO, and 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls.

21 CFR Part 11–aligned · HIPAA-aligned security · No credit card required

Overview

Castor EDC Alternatives

Castor is used by many teams for EDC and eConsent. Teams evaluating Castor often look for alternatives that offer different pricing, integrated ePRO in the same platform, or a different fit for early-phase and regulatory requirements. This page is for sponsors and CROs actively comparing EDC vendors or looking for options that match their study size and workflow. Capture is one alternative: a single platform for EDC, eConsent, ePRO, and safety with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls and HIPAA-aligned security, built for early-phase and mid-size trials.

Why teams look for Castor EDC alternatives

Teams compare EDC vendors for many reasons: pricing fit, need for integrated ePRO, implementation speed, or support for sponsor validation. If you are evaluating Castor and want to see alternatives that offer a single platform for EDC, eConsent, and ePRO with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls, transparent comparison criteria include implementation speed, pricing model, eConsent/ePRO integration, and documentation for sponsor validation.

What to look for when comparing EDC alternatives

  • Implementation speed and time to first patient
  • Pricing model: per-seat vs. study-based; fit for early-phase and small trials
  • Integrated eConsent, ePRO, and EDC in one platform and one audit trail
  • 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls and HIPAA-aligned security
  • Documentation and support for sponsor validation and UAT
  • Export for analysis and regulatory submissions

Why teams consider alternatives to Castor

  • Pricing or contract fit for study size and budget
  • Need for integrated ePRO in the same platform as EDC and eConsent
  • Implementation or change-control timelines
  • Support for sponsor validation and regulatory documentation

Where Capture fits as an alternative

  • Single platform for EDC, eConsent, ePRO, and safety; one audit trail
  • Rapid study build and deployment; flexible amendments
  • 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls and HIPAA-aligned security
  • Documentation to support sponsor validation (Enterprise); pricing that scales with study size
  • Built for early-phase and mid-size trials; compare options or book a demo to evaluate fit

Related

OpenClinica alternativesREDCap alternativesFeatures

FAQ

Questions we hear a lot

Who is this Castor EDC alternatives page for?
Sponsors and CROs actively comparing EDC vendors or looking for options that match their study size and workflow. If you are evaluating Castor and want to see alternatives with integrated eConsent and ePRO, this page is for you.
What should I compare when evaluating EDC alternatives?
Consider implementation speed, pricing fit for your study size, whether eConsent and ePRO are integrated, 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls, and support for sponsor validation. Capture offers one platform with these attributes for early-phase and mid-size trials.
Is Capture 21 CFR Part 11–aligned?
Yes. Capture is designed with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls (electronic signatures, audit trails, access control) and HIPAA-aligned security. We provide documentation to support sponsor validation when required (Enterprise).

Ready to see Capture in action?

Explore the platform with a free sandbox. No sales call required.