EDC for Pre-Clinical to Clinical Transition Studies

EDC for pre-clinical to clinical transition: first-in-human readiness, safety and PK capture, and 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls in one platform.

21 CFR Part 11–aligned · HIPAA-aligned security · No credit card required

Supporting dense PK and safety workflows in first-in-human studies

First-in-human studies generate more data per participant per day than almost any other study type. A typical SAD cohort day may involve pre-dose assessments, dose administration with exact timestamp, and 10–15 post-dose PK blood draws at precise time points (e.g., 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose), along with vital signs, ECGs, and safety labs at multiple intervals. This density of data collection requires an EDC system that can handle time-stamped entries, complex visit structures, and rapid data entry without slowing down the clinical site. Capture supports these workflows through configurable visit schedules with time-point-specific forms. Each PK sample collection can be logged with an exact datetime, and edit checks can flag samples collected outside protocol-defined windows. Safety assessments (vital signs, labs, ECGs) are captured alongside PK data in the same visit structure, giving the medical monitor a complete picture of each participant’s status at every time point. This integrated view is critical during dose-escalation decisions, where the safety and PK profile of the current cohort determines whether the next dose level proceeds.

  • Time-stamped PK sample collection with configurable time points and window tolerances
  • Dense visit structures supporting 10–20+ assessments per participant per dosing day
  • Safety assessments (vital signs, labs, ECGs) captured alongside PK data in the same visit
  • Edit checks flag collections outside protocol-defined windows for immediate correction
  • Integrated safety and PK view for medical monitor dose-escalation decisions

Managing protocol evolution during the FIH study

FIH protocols are inherently adaptive. Dose-escalation decisions depend on emerging safety and PK data. New cohorts may be added (e.g., food-effect, Japanese bridging, or additional dose levels). Sampling schedules may be refined based on preliminary PK results. Inclusion or exclusion criteria may be tightened based on early safety signals. These changes need to be reflected in the EDC system quickly and cleanly, without disrupting data already collected for earlier cohorts. Capture handles protocol evolution through its configuration-driven amendment process. Study builders can add new dose cohorts, modify visit schedules, update CRF forms, and revise edit checks through the browser. Each amendment is documented in the audit trail with version information, timestamps, and reason-for-change. Data collected under earlier protocol versions is preserved with its original version context, so the complete study history is traceable during analysis and regulatory review. This self-service amendment capability is particularly important for FIH studies, where dose-escalation meetings may result in study changes that need to be implemented within days. Waiting weeks for a vendor to process form changes is not compatible with the pace of FIH development.

  • Self-service amendments: add dose cohorts, modify visits, and update forms without vendor dependency
  • Version-controlled changes with audit trail documentation showing what changed, when, and why
  • Data from earlier protocol versions preserved with original version context
  • Rapid turnaround from dose-escalation decision to EDC update—days, not weeks
  • Consent form updates can be deployed alongside CRF amendments within the same system

From FIH to Phase 1b and beyond: leveraging your transition investment

The pre-clinical to clinical transition represents your first significant investment in clinical trial infrastructure. The EDC system you select, the CRF designs you build, the consent workflows you establish, and the data export structures you develop all have implications beyond your FIH study. If your FIH produces positive safety and PK data, you will likely advance quickly to a Phase 1b or Phase 2 study—and the speed and efficiency of that transition depends in part on the technology decisions you made at the FIH stage. Capture is designed to carry your investment forward. The CRF library you built for your FIH study—demographics, medical history, safety panels, PK collection forms, conmed logs—can be cloned and adapted for your next protocol. Sites and CRUs trained on Capture need minimal re-onboarding. Your data team retains familiarity with export structures and analysis pipelines. And your regulatory team can reference validation documentation from the FIH study when qualifying the system for subsequent protocols. This technology continuity across study phases is a meaningful operational advantage, particularly for startup and early-stage biotech companies where every week saved in study transition directly impacts burn rate, timeline to key milestones, and investor confidence in your ability to execute.

  • CRF libraries from FIH serve as reusable templates for Phase 1b and Phase 2 protocols
  • Sites and CRUs trained on Capture need minimal re-onboarding for subsequent studies
  • Export structures and PK/PD analysis pipelines carry forward with incremental adjustments
  • Validation documentation from FIH can be referenced for subsequent study qualification
  • Technology continuity across phases reduces burn rate and accelerates milestone timelines

Overview

EDC for Pre-Clinical to Clinical Transition Studies

The pre-clinical to clinical transition is one of the most critical inflection points in drug development. Your compound has completed IND-enabling non-clinical studies—toxicology, pharmacology, ADME, manufacturing—and the regulatory authority has cleared (or is reviewing) your IND or CTA. Now you need to move from laboratory science to human subjects research, and the operational requirements change fundamentally. You need an electronic data capture system that can support first-in-human (FIH) readiness: protocol-driven visit schedules, informed consent capture, dense safety and pharmacokinetic sampling workflows, adverse event reporting, and a complete audit trail that meets regulatory expectations from day one. This transition is time-sensitive. Every week of delay between regulatory clearance and first dose costs money and extends your timeline to proof-of-concept data. Yet this is also the stage where many teams first encounter the clinical trial software market and discover that enterprise EDC platforms require months of implementation, large upfront commitments, and feature sets designed for programs far larger than their Phase 1 study. Capture provides EDC, eConsent, ePRO, and safety in one platform with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls and HIPAA-aligned infrastructure. The platform is designed for exactly this moment: when you need to go from protocol finalization to data capture readiness as quickly as possible, without compromising on compliance or audit trail integrity. Study builders configure CRFs, visit schedules (including dense PK sampling windows), consent forms, and edit checks through the browser. The same system handles informed consent, clinician-entered CRF data, safety reporting, and optional patient-reported outcomes. For teams making this transition for the first time, Capture provides a structured path from protocol to production: build in a free sandbox, test with your study team, validate when required, and deploy to production. For experienced teams, the configuration-driven approach means you can have your study ready for first dose in weeks rather than months.

Why pre-clinical to clinical transition is different

The pre-clinical to clinical transition places unique demands on your data capture infrastructure. Unlike ongoing clinical programs where teams have established EDC systems and operational playbooks, this transition often represents the first time a team needs to select, implement, and deploy clinical trial software. The learning curve is steep, the timeline is compressed, and the stakes are high. FIH protocols are typically safety-focused with dense sampling schedules. A single-ascending-dose (SAD) or multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) study may require 15–20 blood draws per participant per day during dosing periods, each captured with exact timestamps. Sentinel dosing rules may require that only one or two participants receive the compound before safety data is reviewed for the remaining cohort. These operational patterns require an EDC system that can support complex visit structures, time-stamped sample collection, and flexible cohort management. At the same time, the protocol is likely to evolve. Pre-clinical data may inform dose adjustments, cohort additions, or changes to the sampling schedule after the study has started. Your EDC must handle these amendments cleanly, with version control and audit trail documentation that demonstrates exactly what changed, when, and why. Capture is built for this transition: one platform that is fast to deploy, easy to amend, and maintains the audit trails and access controls suitable for regulatory and ethics review. You do not need global Phase 3 features—you need one system that gets you from IND clearance to first dose without delay and captures the safety and PK data that will inform your next development decision.

Common pre-clinical to clinical transition workflow

  • IND-enabling non-clinical studies complete: toxicology, pharmacology, ADME, CMC documentation
  • Protocol finalization for first-in-human study: dose levels, cohort design, sampling schedule, safety monitoring rules
  • IND/CTA submission and regulatory authority review; ethics committee / IRB approval
  • EDC build in Capture: CRFs for demographics, medical history, dosing, PK sampling, safety assessments, and concomitant medications
  • Visit schedule configuration with dense sampling windows, sentinel dosing rules, and cohort-level structures
  • eConsent form configuration with protocol-specific information and signature workflows
  • Sandbox testing: study team walkthrough, data entry simulation, edit check verification
  • UAT and validation for regulated studies (Enterprise); sponsor review and sign-off
  • Site activation: CRU or clinical site readiness, coordinator and investigator training on the platform
  • Screening, electronic informed consent capture, eligibility verification, and enrollment of first cohort
  • Dose administration with time-stamped documentation; PK sample collection with exact timestamps
  • Safety monitoring: vital signs, labs, ECGs, AE capture, conmed logging, and medical monitor review
  • Dose-escalation decisions based on safety data review; potential cohort additions or protocol amendments
  • Ongoing data review, query resolution, and data cleaning throughout enrollment
  • Database lock, data export for PK/PD modeling and safety analysis, and regulatory deliverable preparation

Traditional tool pain points

  • Long EDC implementation timelines (3–6 months) that delay FIH enrollment after IND clearance
  • Enterprise pricing and minimum commitments that exceed the budget for a single FIH study
  • Heavy change control processes when the protocol evolves based on emerging safety or PK data
  • Separate systems for consent and EDC that fragment the audit trail and create reconciliation work
  • Feature complexity designed for late-phase programs that adds training burden for FIH study teams
  • Limited support for dense PK sampling schedules and complex cohort management in standard EDC tools
  • Vendor dependency for form changes and visit schedule updates during an active dose-escalation study

How Capture supports pre-clinical to clinical transition

  • Rapid study build and deployment: configure CRFs, visit schedules, consent forms, and edit checks in the browser
  • Dense PK sampling schedule support with time-stamped collection points and flexible window tolerances
  • Cohort-level study structures for SAD, MAD, and food-effect designs with configurable dose levels
  • Unified EDC, eConsent, ePRO, and safety in one platform with one audit trail from consent to database lock
  • Flexible amendments with full audit trail—add dose cohorts, modify sampling schedules, update consent forms as the study evolves
  • 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls (electronic signatures, audit trails, role-based access) and HIPAA-aligned security
  • Real-time safety data capture: AEs, vital signs, labs, ECGs, and conmed records accessible for medical monitor review
  • Free sandbox for study build, testing, and team familiarization before production deployment
  • Documentation for sponsor validation and UAT for regulated FIH studies (Enterprise)
  • Export for PK/PD modeling (NONMEM, Monolix, R, Python) and regulatory deliverables
  • Scale from FIH to Phase 1b, Phase 2, and multi-site studies on the same platform

FAQ

Questions we hear a lot

Is Capture suitable for pre-clinical to clinical transition?
Yes. Capture is designed for early-phase and FIH readiness. You get one platform with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls for safety, PK, consent, and CRF data capture. Many teams use Capture to prepare for and execute their first-in-human studies.
How quickly can we be ready for first dose?
Study build can start once you have protocol and CRF requirements. Many teams configure their FIH study in the sandbox and deploy to production within weeks. For regulated studies, timelines include validation and UAT. There is no multi-month vendor implementation process.
What about compliance and regulatory readiness?
Capture is designed with 21 CFR Part 11–aligned controls (electronic signatures, audit trails, role-based access) and HIPAA-aligned security. For Enterprise clients, we provide documentation to support sponsor validation, UAT, and regulatory inspection readiness.
Can Capture handle dense PK sampling schedules?
Yes. You can configure time-point-specific forms with exact timestamp capture and window tolerances. This supports SAD, MAD, and other FIH designs with 10–20+ PK samples per participant per dosing day.
How do we handle dose-escalation amendments?
Capture supports self-service amendments through the browser. You can add new dose cohorts, modify visit schedules, update forms, and revise edit checks. All changes are documented in the audit trail with version control and reason-for-change.
Can we manage sentinel dosing rules in Capture?
Yes. You can structure your study with sentinel participant enrollment, where safety data for the first participants in a cohort is reviewed before the remaining participants are dosed. The platform supports this workflow through cohort-level visit management.
Do we need separate systems for consent and safety?
No. Capture integrates eConsent, CRF data capture, and safety reporting in one platform. Consent records, CRF data, AE reports, and conmed logs are all linked to the same participant record with a unified audit trail.
Can we export data for PK/PD modeling?
Yes. Capture exports data in structured formats compatible with PK/PD modeling tools (NONMEM, Monolix) and general analysis environments (R, SAS, Python). Time-stamped PK collection data exports with the precision needed for compartmental and non-compartmental analysis.
What if our protocol changes during the study?
Protocol amendments are a normal part of FIH development. Capture supports form, visit, and consent updates through browser-based configuration. Data collected under earlier versions is preserved with version context, maintaining traceability throughout the study.
Can we start building before IND clearance?
Yes. You can use the free Sandbox to build and test your study design while your IND is under review. This allows you to have the EDC ready for deployment as soon as regulatory clearance is received.
Is Capture suitable for CRU-based FIH studies?
Yes. Clinical Research Units (CRUs) that conduct FIH studies use the same Capture platform as other clinical sites. The dense sampling workflows, real-time safety capture, and role-based access controls support the operational patterns typical of inpatient CRU-based studies.
Can we scale to Phase 1b or Phase 2 after our FIH?
Yes. The same platform, CRF designs, and audit trail infrastructure scale to larger studies. Study configurations can be cloned and adapted for follow-on protocols without migration or revalidation.

Ready to see Capture in action?

Explore the platform with a free sandbox. No sales call required.