Guide · Pilot studiesUpdated September 28, 2026

How to run a pilot study that answers the right questions

A pilot study is not a small trial. Its job is to find out whether the full trial can work: can you recruit, will people stay, do the procedures and questionnaires work? Here is how to design one that gives a clear go or no-go.

  • Feasibility objectives
  • Progression criteria
  • Data that decides

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Progression criteria · Pilot RCT

Recruitment

2.1/mo/site

Retention

78%

Adherence

84%

Recruitment: green ≥ 2 per site per month21/20

Green

Retention at 12 weeks: green ≥ 80%78/100

Amber: proceed with changes

Questionnaire completion: green ≥ 80%86/100

Green

Traffic-light criteria agreed in advance

The short version

  • Pilot and feasibility studies test whether a future trial can be done, not whether the treatment works. Do not power them for efficacy.
  • Write feasibility objectives: recruitment rate, eligibility and consent rates, retention, adherence, data completeness, acceptability of procedures.
  • Agree progression criteria in advance, often as green, amber and red thresholds that decide go, go with changes, or stop.
  • Sample size is justified by the feasibility estimates you need; commonly cited rules of thumb range from around 12 per arm to 30 or more overall.
  • Report using the CONSORT extension for pilot and feasibility trials.

Design

Feasibility objectives, not efficacy hypotheses

The most common mistake in pilot studies is treating them as underpowered efficacy trials and reporting p-values that mean nothing. A pilot's value comes from the numbers the full trial needs: how many eligible people there are, how many agree to take part, how many stay, how many complete the questionnaires, how long procedures take and whether participants find them acceptable.

Each of those becomes an objective with a pre-specified measure. "Recruitment rate" becomes "participants randomised per site per month". "Retention" becomes "proportion with the primary outcome at 12 weeks". With clear measures, the pilot ends with an answer instead of an impression.

Progression criteria

Progression criteria turn feasibility results into a decision. A common format is traffic lights: green means proceed as planned, amber means proceed with specific changes, red means do not proceed without major redesign. Agree them with funders and the steering committee before the pilot starts, and publish them in the protocol.

Sample size

Pilots are sized to estimate feasibility parameters (a recruitment rate, a retention proportion, a standard deviation for the future sample size calculation) with reasonable precision, not to detect an effect. Rules of thumb in the literature range from about 12 participants per arm to 30 or more in total, and some approaches size pilots from the planned main trial. Justify the number in the protocol. See sample size calculation.

Participant funnel
Identified40
Consented31
Enrolled26
Randomized22

Site risk

Site 03 needs attention

Action items

2 overdue

What to measure

Common feasibility measures and where the data comes from

ObjectiveMeasureData source
RecruitmentParticipants randomised per site per monthEnrolment dates by site
EligibilityProportion of screened people eligibleScreening log and screen-failure reasons
ConsentProportion of eligible people who consentScreening and consent records
RetentionProportion with primary outcome at follow-upVisit completion
AdherenceProportion receiving the intended doseAdherence diary or accountability
Data completenessProportion of questionnaires completedePRO compliance
AcceptabilityParticipant and staff viewsShort questionnaires, interviews

In Capture

Feasibility data comes out of the study itself

Screening numbers and screen-failure reasons, consent dates, enrolment by site, visit completion and questionnaire compliance are all recorded as the study runs. The dashboard and status overview show them live, so the steering committee can see progression metrics without a separate tracking spreadsheet.

  • Screening wizard with screen-failure reasons.
  • Enrolment funnel and compliance on the dashboard.
  • Exports by site and date for progression reports.
EDC for feasibility studies
app.capture.study · Dashboard
Capture study dashboard with enrolment, compliance, safety overview and site risk monitor

Set up a pilot with the main trial's forms

Build once in the free sandbox; reuse the configuration for the full trial.

Build your pilot study free

Design choice

Internal or external pilot?

An external pilot is a separate study. Its data is used only to decide whether and how to run the main trial, and it is analysed and reported on its own. An internal pilot is the first phase of the main trial: if progression criteria are met, the trial simply continues, and the pilot participants are included in the final analysis.

Internal pilots save time and participants, but the protocol, forms and procedures must already be final, because changing them after the pilot would mix two versions in one analysis. External pilots allow bigger changes, at the cost of a gap between studies. Choose based on how confident you are in the procedures: if the questionnaires, visit schedule or intervention delivery might change, run an external pilot.

Before the pilot starts

Pilot study checklist

Feasibility objectives

Each with a measure and a data source.

Progression criteria

Green, amber and red thresholds agreed and in the protocol.

Sample size justified

Based on the precision needed for feasibility estimates.

Screening log

Screened, eligible, consented and reasons for non-participation.

Acceptability data

Short questionnaires or interviews planned.

Reporting plan

CONSORT extension for pilot and feasibility trials.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

What is the difference between a pilot and a feasibility study?

Terminology varies. Feasibility studies ask whether a trial can be done; pilot studies are a type of feasibility study that runs a smaller version of the future trial.

Should a pilot study test efficacy?

No. Pilots are not powered for efficacy; they estimate the parameters needed to plan the main trial.

How many participants does a pilot need?

Enough to estimate the feasibility measures with useful precision. Rules of thumb range from about 12 per arm to 30 or more overall.

What are progression criteria?

Pre-agreed thresholds, often green, amber and red, that decide whether and how to proceed to the main trial.

Can the pilot configuration be reused?

Yes. Capture study configurations can be exported and imported into a new study.

Pilot with the system you will scale on

Build once, reuse for the main trial. Free sandbox.

Build your pilot study free