REDCap is licensed through a consortium aimed at institutions, and its terms define who may use it. If you are a small biotech, a CRO or a sponsor working with a university site, here is what to read, who to ask and what to do if the answer is no.
Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned
Study owner
Builds and configures the study
Principal investigator
Oversees the site, signs off the casebook
Sub-investigator
Enters and signs clinical data
Study coordinator
Screens subjects, enters visit data
Monitor (CRA)
Verifies data, raises queries
Data manager
Reviews, freezes and locks data
Participant
Completes their own questionnaires
The short version
The licence question
REDCap is distributed under terms published by the consortium that develops it. As we read the consortium's public material, the licence is intended for not-for-profit institutions and other non-commercial organisations, and software access is organised around institutional partners rather than individual sales to companies. Because licence terms are legal documents that change, treat that sentence as a pointer, not a ruling: read the current terms on the consortium's website, and ask your institution's REDCap administrator how they apply to your situation.
The practical consequence for sponsors is that the person who can answer is rarely the study team. If you are a for-profit biotech, the question is whether any institution would be entitled to provide you an instance at all. If you are an academic investigator running a study funded or supplied by a company, the question is whether the arrangement is within what your institution's licence covers. Neither is a matter for a web page. Put the question to the institution's administrator and its legal or research contracts office, and keep the written answer in the study master file.
Beyond the licence
Suppose the licence question is settled. A commercial sponsor still carries obligations that an academic investigator may not: it must be able to show that the system used for regulated data is fit for purpose. That means validation evidence for your intended use, documented audit trail and signature controls, controlled access for monitors, auditors and statisticians, and procedures for upgrades and incidents. The REDCap Part 11 page lists the documents to request from a hosting institution, and the computer system validation guide explains how validation is scoped to intended use.
Hosting matters too. If an institution runs the instance, your study lives alongside others on infrastructure you do not control, on that institution's upgrade schedule. That can be fine; it should be a decision, not a surprise. Capture's equivalent is simpler to state: a hosted platform in the EU (Frankfurt) or the USA (N. Virginia), with row-level security between studies, role-based access, and documentation to support sponsor validation for enterprise customers.
Data ownership and exit deserve their own line in any agreement. Ask what happens to the data, the audit trail and the configuration if the arrangement ends, in what format they can be exported, and for how long records remain retrievable. Regulators expect records to stay readable for the required retention period, and a sponsor that cannot get its audit trail out of someone else's system has a problem at exactly the wrong moment.
Finally, cost. Where an institution provides REDCap at no licence fee, the sponsor's true cost may still include the institution's service charges, validation work and staff time. Fill in the REDCap true-cost worksheet with real numbers before comparing with a hosted EDC.
Sponsor checklist
| Question | Ask | Evidence to file |
|---|---|---|
| Is our use within the licence terms? | REDCap administrator, legal | Written confirmation and the version of the terms read |
| Who hosts and maintains the system? | Hosting institution or vendor | Hosting and support agreement |
| Is it validated for our intended use? | Quality unit | Validation plan and summary report |
| Can external monitors and auditors have scoped access? | System administrator | Role design and access procedure |
| Who owns the data and the audit trail? | Contracts office | Data ownership clause |
| What happens if the arrangement ends? | Contracts office | Export and retention terms |
Build the study yourself in the free sandbox: forms, edit checks, roles and an audit trail. No credit card, no sales call, and you pay only when you go live.
If the answer is no, or unclear
If REDCap is not available to you, or the answer is unclear and your timeline is not, the alternative is a platform you can start on without anyone's permission. Capture is a self-serve, all-in-one clinical trial platform: EDC, eCRF builder, ePRO, eConsent, randomisation and safety reporting in one system with one audit trail, suitable for Phase 1, 2 and 3. You build the study yourself, or upload a protocol and let the AI draft visits and forms for your review, and test everything in the sandbox before paying.
For commercial teams the useful details are contractual and operational. There is no setup fee, no per-site fee and no per-seat licence, and protocol amendments are made by your own study team without change orders. Sites join by QR code or invitation, monitors get role-based access, and every record carries a field-level audit trail. See clinical trial software for startup biotech and how to choose an EDC system for the wider evaluation, and the REDCap alternatives page for neutral comparison criteria.
If you already have a design in REDCap, for example from an academic collaborator, how to migrate from REDCap shows how to rebuild it quickly from a data dictionary export. The full feature-by-feature view is on the Capture vs REDCap comparison.
Next steps
On the consortium's website, not a summary, and note the date.
Administrator and contracts office, naming your study arrangement.
Use the table above for the list.
Include hosting, validation and staff time on both sides.
Build one real form in the Capture sandbox so a decision is not blocked.
That is set by the consortium's licence terms, which we do not control or interpret. Read the current terms and ask the REDCap administrator and legal office at the institution involved.
It depends on the institution's licence and policies and on what the sponsor needs to verify. Ask the institution and agree the data system in the study contract.
The system for its intended use: audit trail, signatures, access control, upgrades and backups, with documented tests and a summary report. Your quality unit decides what is adequate.
No. There is no setup fee, no per-site fee and no per-seat licence. You pay only when a live study with real participants begins, and the site does not publish prices.
Yes. Sign up, build the study in the free sandbox with every feature, and test it. No credit card.
Yes. Capture is suitable for Phase 1, 2 and 3, with multi-site support, role-based access, queries, SDV and an audit trail.
No. It is general information to help you ask the right questions. Licence interpretation belongs to your legal team.
Keep exploring
Capture vs REDCap
A side-by-side comparison.
REDCap alternatives
Comparison criteria.
How to migrate from REDCap
Rebuild from a data dictionary.
Is REDCap Part 11 compliant?
What to verify and document.
Clinical trial software for startup biotech
For small sponsors.
How to choose an EDC system
Selection criteria.
Free sandbox with every feature. No credit card, and you pay only when you go live.