Hematology trials run on repeated blood counts, event logs such as bleeds, crises and transfusions, and disease-specific response criteria. Capture handles repeating logs with their own audit trail, lab tables with reference ranges and participant diaries in one study.
Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned
Bleed diary · New entry
Subject 021-0004 · Haemophilia A
Date and time bleed started
Location
Cause
Treated with factor
What matters in hematology trials
Study design
In many non-malignant hematology trials, the primary endpoint is a count of events over time: bleeds, crises, transfusions. That makes the event logs the most important data in the study. Each event needs its date, type, cause or trigger, treatment and outcome, recorded consistently so events can be counted and classified in analysis.
Some events are recorded by participants at home (bleeds in haemophilia), others by sites from medical records (transfusions, hospital admissions for crises). Both types work best as repeating rows, one per event, where each row carries its own audit trail. Define in the protocol what counts as a separate event, for example a new bleed at the same site within 72 hours counted as the same bleed.
Haemophilia, sickle cell disease and thalassaemia are major areas for gene and cell therapies, which bring long-term follow-up and specific safety monitoring. See EDC for cell and gene therapy trials.
Units, 24 weeks before
14
Units, weeks 13 to 24
4
Reduction
71%
Repeating logs
Table sections hold repeating rows for transfusions, bleeds recorded at sites, or crisis events. Each row carries its own field-level audit trail, and range checks on values such as pre-transfusion haemoglobin raise queries at entry. Participant bleed diaries run on their own phones from a secure link.

Laboratory data
AI can draft lab tables from a lab manual or file, with analytes as rows, units, results and reference ranges split by sex and age where the source has them. Nothing is saved without review. Range checks flag values outside expected limits so they are confirmed quickly.
Haemoglobin HGB · g/dL
3 strataSet up repeating rows and reference ranges in the free sandbox.
Endpoints
| Condition | Typical endpoint | Data needed |
|---|---|---|
| Haemophilia | Annualised bleeding rate | Bleed diary with date, location, cause, treatment; exposure days |
| Thalassaemia, MDS anaemia | Transfusion independence or burden reduction | Transfusion log with units, dates and pre-transfusion haemoglobin |
| Sickle cell disease | Annualised rate of vaso-occlusive crises | Event forms with definition criteria and care setting |
| Immune thrombocytopenia | Platelet response | Platelet counts over time, rescue therapy |
| Lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia | Response rate, progression-free survival, MRD | Response assessments per disease criteria, labs, marrow, imaging |
Patient experience
Anaemia causes fatigue, sickle cell disease causes pain, and blood cancers and their treatments affect every part of life. Patient-reported outcomes such as FACIT-Fatigue are common secondary endpoints, and they are most complete when collected at home between visits rather than only in clinic.
In malignant haematology, performance status and quality of life are recorded alongside response. See the Karnofsky template for transplant settings and EDC for oncology trials for tumour response workflows.
Study build
Bleeds, crises or transfusions defined, including when events merge.
Repeating rows or participant diaries with the defining fields.
Pre-study event or transfusion history for comparison.
Blood counts with sex- and age-specific reference ranges.
Disease-specific criteria written into forms.
Fatigue or pain measures at home between visits.
The number of treated bleeds per year, calculated from participant bleed diaries. It is the main efficacy endpoint in many haemophilia trials.
From a complete transfusion log over a defined period, often with pre-transfusion haemoglobin thresholds.
Yes. A bleed diary opens on the participant's phone from a secure link, with no app.
Yes. Each row in a repeating log carries its own field-level audit trail.
Yes. Lab tables can hold reference ranges split by sex and age.
Yes, in the free sandbox with every feature.
Repeating logs, diaries and lab tables. Free sandbox.