Therapeutic area · SarcopeniaUpdated October 6, 2026

EDC for sarcopenia clinical trials

Sarcopenia studies measure muscle strength, mass and physical performance repeatedly, in older participants, often with exercise or nutrition interventions. Capture holds the timed tests, DXA results, questionnaires, falls and adverse events in one audited study, built free in the sandbox with no CRO set-up.

  • Strength and performance tests
  • ePRO on the participant's phone
  • Free sandbox, pay when live

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Physical performance visit (demo study)
Subject 001-0031 · Week 12Site-completed

Strength

Grip strength, dominant hand, trial 1

GRIP1
24.5kg

Grip strength, dominant hand, trial 2

GRIP2
25.0kg

Grip strength, dominant hand, trial 3

GRIP3
24.0kg

Performance

Five chair stands, time

CHAIR5
13.2s

Gait speed, 4 m

GAIT4
0.92m/s

Best grip value

GRIPMAX

Calculated, read-only

25.0 kg Calculated
Edit checks flag impossible values at entrySave
Demo data only. Repeated trials are structured fields, and the best value is calculated, not retyped.

Sarcopenia trial data in brief

  • Endpoints are measurements, not just questionnaires. Grip strength, chair stands, gait speed, a short physical performance battery and lean mass from imaging, each with a standard method.
  • Method variation is the data quality risk. Dynamometer type, hand tested, number of trials, walking distance and aids used all change the result, so they belong on the form.
  • Interventions are often exercise or nutrition. Session attendance, protein or supplement intake and progression are as important as the measurements.
  • Participants are older. Short phone-browser questionnaires with no app, clear reminders and a straightforward consent process keep the burden low.
  • Falls and adverse events need a clear route. Falls, injuries and other events are captured on an adverse event form with an SAE workflow.

The indication

What sarcopenia studies measure, and what that means for the database

Sarcopenia is the age-related loss of muscle strength, mass and function. Guidance such as the EWGSOP2 consensus describes a stepped approach: screening with a questionnaire such as SARC-F, assessing muscle strength with grip strength or a chair stand test, confirming low muscle quantity or quality with imaging such as DXA, and grading severity by physical performance measures such as gait speed or the short physical performance battery. Trials typically borrow these measures as endpoints. Your protocol defines which thresholds and definitions apply; this page does not set clinical cut-offs and does not assess any treatment.

In data terms, that produces a study with a small number of repeated, standardised physical tests, one or two imaging results per participant, a handful of questionnaires and, depending on the intervention, a log of sessions or intake. The measurements must be comparable across visits and across sites, so the form has to record how the test was done, not only the number. Our EDC for longevity clinical trials page covers the wider healthy-ageing field, and the 6-minute walk test template shows how a timed performance test appears on an eCRF form.

Data model

What the EDC must capture in a sarcopenia trial

Data groupWhat is recordedHow it fits in Capture
ScreeningSymptom questionnaire, eligibility, comorbidities, medicationsEligibility form, screening wizard and ePRO; consent before any procedure
Grip strengthHand tested, dynamometer model, each trial value, best valueSite form with repeated trials as fields or table rows; calculated best or mean value
Chair stand and gait speedTime for five rises, walking distance, time, aids usedTimed fields with ranges; edit checks for implausible values; calculated speed in m/s
Physical performance batteryBalance, gait and chair-stand components and a total scoreSite form with component fields and a calculated total
Body compositionAppendicular lean mass, fat mass, scanner and software versionImaging result form; scanner model recorded so results are comparable
Intervention logExercise sessions attended, intensity, protein or supplement intakeSession table at the site or a participant diary on the phone
Patient-reported outcomesFunction, quality of life, fatigue, activityePRO questionnaires, with licence details recorded where terms apply
SafetyFalls, fractures, injuries and other adverse eventsAdverse event form, AESI and SAE workflow with audit trail

Measurement quality

Standardising tests across raters and sites

A grip strength reading depends on posture, handle setting and the number of trials. A gait speed depends on distance, start and whether a walking aid is used. If two sites differ on any of that, the pooled analysis carries noise that no statistician can fully remove later. Put the method on the form: record the instrument, the hand, each trial and any deviation. A dropdown with a coded list of deviations (aid used, pain limited effort, test not attempted for safety) is better than a free-text note, because you can count them.

Capture helps in three ways. Edit checks with a range and a priority raise an auto-query when a value is implausible, such as a gait speed that is physically impossible, so a transcription error is corrected within days rather than at database lock. Calculated fields derive the best of three trials or a speed from distance and time and show the result read-only during entry, so everyone uses the same arithmetic. And a site coordinator portal with by-site filtering and a separate rater role keeps multi-site data organised. For multi-site set-up, see the platform overview for site roles, and the schedule of assessments builder to plan which tests sit at which visit.

Rater training records

Many protocols require evidence that raters were trained on the test method. Keep the training log in your study documents and use the delegation log template to record who may perform which assessment.

Build the performance-test forms and see the edit checks work

Use the free sandbox with every feature. No credit card, no time limit, and you pay only when the study goes live.

Build your sarcopenia study free

Interventions

Exercise, nutrition and drug interventions

Sarcopenia trials often test resistance exercise, protein or amino acid supplementation, vitamin D or a drug candidate, alone or in combination. The data requirements change with the intervention. An exercise study needs a session log with attendance, intensity and progression, and a way to record sessions missed and why. A nutrition study needs an intake record and product traceability. A drug study needs dosing, supply accountability, randomisation and safety labs. Capture handles all of these within the same study, because they are forms, diaries and kit records, not separate systems.

For nutrition and supplement designs, see clinical trial software for nutrition research and EDC for supplement clinical trials. For placebo-controlled or sham-exercise arms, randomisation software covers allocation and blinded roles, which never receive treatment-arm values. For investigational products, IMP inventory and drug accountability describes kit dispensing and returns.

Setup

Setting up a sarcopenia study without a CRO

  1. 1

    Upload the protocol

    Let the AI study builder draft the visit schedule and forms from the PDF or DOCX. You review everything before it is saved.

  2. 2

    Build the performance forms

    Create grip, chair stand, gait and battery forms with typed fields, units and ranges. Add calculated fields for best value and speed.

  3. 3

    Add the imaging result form

    Record the scanner, software version and the lean mass values the imaging unit returns.

  4. 4

    Set up ePRO and consent

    Questionnaires open on the participant's phone from a link or QR code. Use eConsent with email OTP and countersignature.

  5. 5

    Add the intervention and safety forms

    Session or intake log, plus the adverse event form and falls items.

  6. 6

    Test, approve and enrol

    Enter sample data in the sandbox, then approve the forms. Approved forms are locked for live use.

Participants

Designing for older participants

Participants in these studies are often older, and a good design recognises that. Keep questionnaires short, avoid dense matrices on a phone screen, and use clear completion windows with a reminder ladder that sends a limited number of reminders and respects quiet hours. Offer a site-completed paper-equivalent route for anyone who cannot use a phone, entering the answers on the participant's behalf under the protocol's rules. Consent matters especially: allow time, offer a printed copy, and where the protocol allows, a Legally Authorized Representative signature. The ePRO page describes the questionnaire experience.

Falls deserve their own small form even when they are not formally adverse events. A monthly question about falls, injuries and fear of falling, plus an event form for any fall that needs care, gives you data that matter for the analysis and for safety review. Capture records every change with timestamp, user, old value, new value and reason, so a corrected falls date is visible, not silent.

Before you start

Sarcopenia study data capture checklist

Definition fixed

The consensus definition or protocol thresholds used for eligibility and endpoints, written down.

Methods standardised

Instrument, posture, trial count, distance and aids defined and mirrored on every form.

Imaging plan agreed

Scanner, software version and the data file returned to the study.

Intervention log designed

Sessions, intake or dosing recorded in a form that fits the intervention.

Falls and safety flow tested

Falls items, adverse event form and SAE workflow exercised in the sandbox.

Licences handled

Questionnaire licences recorded on participant forms; clinician-form licences kept with study documents.

Export verified

CSV or Excel with data dictionary opens in your analysis software.

Responsibilities

Compliance and what stays with the sponsor

Capture offers 21 CFR Part 11-aligned controls, a field-level audit trail, role-based access and EU (Frankfurt) or US (N. Virginia) hosting, and the sponsor remains responsible for validated use and for the protocol, ethics approval and regulatory submissions. This page is not medical, legal or regulatory advice and makes no efficacy claim about any intervention. For a first study, how to run a pilot study is a practical companion, and EDC for investigator-initiated trials covers the academic set-up.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

Can Capture record grip strength, chair stand and gait speed?

Yes. Build site forms with typed fields, units and ranges for each trial, with calculated fields for best value or speed and edit checks that raise a query on implausible values.

Does Capture supply SARC-F or SPPB forms?

No. Capture does not supply licensed instruments or verify licences. You build the forms from your protocol, and for participant questionnaires you can record licence details on the questionnaire.

Can participants answer questionnaires on a phone?

Yes. Questionnaires open in the phone browser from a secure link or QR code, with no app and no password, plus reminders and completion windows.

Can we store DXA results?

Yes, as typed fields on an imaging result form, with the scanner and software version recorded. Capture stores the results; it does not analyse images.

Does it support exercise or nutrition interventions?

Yes. Record sessions and intake on site forms or phone diaries, and use kit accountability and randomisation for supplements or investigational products.

How much does it cost to start?

The sandbox is free with every feature, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when the study goes live with real participants.

Build your sarcopenia study without a CRO

Free sandbox with every feature. No credit card, and you pay only when you go live.

Build your sarcopenia study free