Comparison · Datacubed HealthUpdated September 29, 2026

Capture vs Datacubed Health: engagement that protects your endpoints

Datacubed focuses on participant engagement in eCOA. Capture protects compliance with completion windows, a three-step reminder ladder and at-risk alerts, with participant data in the same study as site data.

  • Free sandbox, no sales call
  • EDC, ePRO, eConsent, randomization
  • Part 11-aligned controls

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Evaluation · Datacubed vs Capture

Tests

5

Hands-on

4

To confirm

1

  • Consent a test participant remotelySame test, both systems
  • Complete a diary on your own phoneSame test, both systems
  • Miss an entry and watch the remindersSame test, both systems
  • See participant data next to site dataSame test, both systems
  • Compare total cost for your studyAsk both vendors
Test both on your own protocol

Capture vs Datacubed: the short version

  • Datacubed Health offers eCOA and participant engagement technology for decentralized and hybrid trials.
  • Engagement features aim to keep participants completing questionnaires over months.
  • Capture focuses on the mechanics that protect endpoint data: windows, reminders when due, the next day and before the window closes, and at-risk participants flagged.
  • Participant data lands in the same audit trail as site data.
  • Measure compliance in a pilot or sandbox test rather than relying on feature lists.

0

sales calls needed to start building

1

audit trail across EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization

Free

sandbox with every feature, no time limit

EU + US

hosting in Frankfurt or N. Virginia

The comparison

What actually drives compliance

Participants complete questionnaires when they are short, clearly timed, easy to open and reminded at the right moment, and when the site notices early if they fall behind. Engagement features can help, but the basics decide most of the outcome: a link that opens straight into the questionnaire, a sensible window, and a site that calls when a participant slips.

Capture builds those basics in: secure links by email or SMS with no app, reminders that stop when the task is done and respect quiet hours, and a dashboard that flags at-risk participants and overdue tasks. See ePRO compliance reminders.

What to compare

What to test when comparing Capture and Datacubed

CriterionWhy it mattersCapture
Compliance toolsMissing diary days are missing dataWindows, three-step reminder ladder, quiet hours, at-risk participants flagged
Device modelCost and participant frictionBYOD in the browser with no app; clinic devices supported
OnboardingFriction for participantsSecure link; no app and no password
Licensed instrumentsLicence tracking and faithful migrationLicence number, holder and expiry per form; collection blocked if lapsed
Link to site dataReconciliation effortePRO, eConsent and EDC in one study and one audit trail
Commercial modelFit for your study sizeFree sandbox; no setup fee; pay only when you go live

This table shows Capture's answers only. Ask Datacubed for theirs, and confirm current capabilities and terms directly with them.

Participant data

ePRO on participants' own phones, in the same audit trail

Participants open a secure link with no app to install. Diaries and questionnaires follow the schedule with completion windows, and reminders go out when a task is due, the next day and before the window closes, respecting quiet hours in each participant's time zone. Compliance is visible by study, country and site.

  • BYOD in the browser, no app store.
  • Licence tracking for licensed instruments.
  • At-risk participants flagged.
ePRO software for clinical trials
ePRO compliance by site
Site 0194%
Site 0281%
Site 0358%

At-risk participants

03-0073 diary entries missedReminder delivered
03-011Week 4 questionnaire overdueEmail bounced

eConsent

Consent with evidence you can hand to an inspector

Participants sign on screen after confirming a one-time email code and acknowledging that the signature is legally binding. The investigator countersigns with password re-authentication. Witness and legally authorised representative signatures are supported, and each signature is linked to the exact document content.

  • Remote or in-clinic signing.
  • Signed PDF with audit trail.
  • Consent in the same study as the data.
eConsent software for clinical trials
Electronic signature

Meaning of signature

I have reviewed this adverse event and confirm the assessment of seriousness, severity and causality.

Signer

Dr. A. Ozola, PI

Password

••••••••••

Verified on the serverAutofill blockedSingle-use token
Sign

Walk through the participant journey

Consent and complete a diary on your own phone in the free sandbox.

Compare it free in the sandbox

Fit

When Datacubed fits, and when Capture does

Datacubed may fit studies where participant engagement design is the main priority and a separate eCOA system alongside the EDC is acceptable.

Capture fits studies that want strong compliance mechanics with participant data in the same study as EDC, eConsent and randomization.

One platform

EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization in one study

Sites enter data on locked, approved forms with edit checks that raise queries at entry. Participants complete questionnaires on their own phones and sign eConsent with verified signatures. Randomization and kit management run in the same study, and everything shares one field-level audit trail.

  • One participant record across every module.
  • No integrations to build or reconcile.
  • Phase 1 through Phase 3.
EDC for Phase 3 clinical trials
app.capture.study · Dashboard
Capture study dashboard with enrolment, compliance, safety overview and site risk monitor

Switching

Moving from Datacubed to Capture

Rebuild questionnaires in Capture, set windows and reminder timing to match the recall period, and test the participant journey on your own phone.

Switch at study boundaries rather than mid-study, especially for licensed instruments, whose electronic versions usually need the licence holder's approval in each new system.

Evaluation

How to evaluate patient-facing technology

Participant journey

Consent, onboarding and first questionnaire on a phone.

Device model

BYOD, provisioned devices or both.

Compliance tools

Windows, reminders and at-risk alerts.

Licensed instruments

Who migrates them and how licences are tracked.

Link to EDC

One audit trail or an integration.

Total cost

Build, per-participant and device costs.

All comparisons

Compare Capture with other platforms

Every comparison uses the same approach: what to test, where each option fits, and Capture's own answers. See all of them on the comparisons hub at /compare.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

How does Capture keep participants compliant?

With completion windows, up to three reminders per task, quiet hours in each participant's time zone and at-risk alerts for sites.

Is Capture a Datacubed alternative?

Yes, for studies that want eCOA in the same system as EDC.

Do participants need an app?

No. Questionnaires open from a secure link in the browser.

Can I test Capture before deciding against Datacubed?

Yes. The free sandbox includes every feature with sample data, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when you go live.

How did you build this comparison?

From public positioning and the criteria teams tell us matter. We state only Capture's own capabilities as fact; confirm Datacubed's current offering with them.

Participant data in the same study as everything else

Free sandbox with every feature.

Compare it free in the sandbox