Comparison · SuvodaUpdated September 29, 2026

Capture vs Suvoda: follow the data, not the feature list

Suvoda is a specialist IRT. Capture runs randomization, blinding and kits inside the EDC. Tracing how a participant's allocation, kits and visit data flow through each setup shows which your study needs.

  • Free sandbox, no sales call
  • EDC, ePRO, eConsent, randomization
  • Part 11-aligned controls

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Evaluation · Suvoda vs Capture

Tests

5

Hands-on

4

To confirm

1

  • Randomize a test participant with strataSame test, both systems
  • Check what a blinded user seesSame test, both systems
  • Test emergency unblindingSame test, both systems
  • Dispense and return a kitSame test, both systems
  • Map your supply chain needsAsk both vendors
Test both on your own protocol

Capture vs Suvoda: the short version

  • Suvoda is best known for interactive response technology (IRT) for randomization and trial supply management, particularly in complex trials.
  • A standalone IRT and an EDC exchange participant, allocation and dispensing data; each exchange is something to specify, test and reconcile.
  • In Capture, allocation, kits and visit data are one record.
  • Capture supports stratification, enrolment caps, blinded roles, emergency unblinding and kit accountability.
  • Complex depot networks and forecasting may still justify a specialist IRT.

0

sales calls needed to start building

1

audit trail across EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization

Free

sandbox with every feature, no time limit

EU + US

hosting in Frankfurt or N. Virginia

The comparison

Trace one participant through each setup

Pick one participant and follow them: screened and enrolled in the EDC, randomized in the IRT, kit assigned, visit data entered, kit returned. In a two-system setup, each step crosses the integration; mismatches such as a participant randomized in one system but missing in the other are a familiar monitoring finding.

In Capture the same participant is randomized at enrolment in the EDC, their allocation is logged in the audit trail, kits are dispensed under e-signature, and blinded users never see the arm. See the Suvoda alternatives guide for the supply-chain side of the decision.

What to compare

What to test when comparing Capture and Suvoda

CriterionWhy it mattersCapture
Randomization designBalance and allocation concealmentBlock randomization with stratification and enrolment caps
BlindingProtecting the trialBlinded roles never receive the treatment arm, including in exports
Emergency unblindingParticipant safetyAvailable to investigators; approvals without revealing the arm; logged
Kit managementDispensing and accountabilityKit dispensing under e-signature; accountability report and export
Data flowReconciliation effortAllocation, kits and visit data in one participant record
Complex supplyDepots, forecasting, resupplyMap requirements; very complex supply may need a specialist IRT

This table shows Capture's answers only. Ask Suvoda for theirs, and confirm current capabilities and terms directly with them.

Randomization

Randomization and kits inside the EDC

Set arms, block size, stratification factors and enrolment caps once at setup. Allocation happens at enrolment, the same way at every site, and is logged in the audit trail. An unblinded administrator owns the randomization and medication lists, and kits are dispensed under electronic signature.

  • Stratified block randomization with caps.
  • Kit dispensing and accountability.
  • Allocation logged in the audit trail.
RTSM software for clinical trials
Dispense IMP · Week 4
Occasion
Kits
Verify
Sign

1 of 2 kits confirmed

K-10418B-2207 · exp 03-2027
K-10419B-2207 · exp 03-2027
Sign stays disabled: confirm all 2 kits before signing.

Blinding

Blinding enforced on the server

Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, not even in the data behind the screen or in exports. Investigators keep emergency unblinding, and the study owner can approve an unblinding request without seeing the answer. Every allocation and unblinding is logged.

  • Treatment arm never sent to blinded users.
  • Emergency unblinding, logged.
  • Approvals without revealing the arm.
Clinical trial randomization software

Study coordinator

Subject 01-004

Randomized · R-0012

Treatment assignment blinded

KitK-10418

Arm columnNot sent

Unblinded administrator

Subject 01-004

Randomized · R-0012

Treatment: Active (A)

KitK-10418

Arm columnA

Same subject, same screen. The arm never reaches blinded roles.

Randomize and dispense in the sandbox

Try it as a blinded and an unblinded user.

Compare it free in the sandbox

Fit

When Suvoda fits, and when Capture does

Suvoda is often the right choice for complex global trials with many depots, forecasting, temperature-controlled supply and sophisticated resupply rules.

Capture fits studies with straightforward supply that want randomization, blinding and kit accountability without a second system to integrate.

One platform

EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization in one study

Sites enter data on locked, approved forms with edit checks that raise queries at entry. Participants complete questionnaires on their own phones and sign eConsent with verified signatures. Randomization and kit management run in the same study, and everything shares one field-level audit trail.

  • One participant record across every module.
  • No integrations to build or reconcile.
  • Phase 1 through Phase 3.
EDC for Phase 3 clinical trials
app.capture.study · Dashboard
Capture study dashboard with enrolment, compliance, safety overview and site risk monitor

Switching

Moving from Suvoda to Capture

Recreate the randomization design in Capture for new studies rather than moving live lists. Keep completed studies' allocation records with their original exports.

Before choosing, write down your supply requirements: depots, kit types, temperature control and resupply. If they are simple, randomization in the EDC is usually enough.

Evaluation

How to evaluate randomization and supply options

Randomization design

Blocks, strata and enrolment caps.

Blinded view

Screens and exports for blinded users.

Emergency unblinding

Who can, and what is logged.

Kit accountability

Dispensing, returns and reports.

Supply complexity

Depots, temperature control and resupply rules.

EDC link

Integration or the same system.

All comparisons

Compare Capture with other platforms

Every comparison uses the same approach: what to test, where each option fits, and Capture's own answers. See all of them on the comparisons hub at /compare.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

Can Capture replace a standalone IRT?

For many studies, yes. Very complex global supply chains may still need a specialist IRT.

Is allocation concealed?

Yes. Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, and an unblinded administrator owns the lists.

Can enrolment be capped?

Yes. Enrolment caps are part of the randomization setup.

Can I test Capture before deciding against Suvoda?

Yes. The free sandbox includes every feature with sample data, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when you go live.

How did you build this comparison?

From public positioning and the criteria teams tell us matter. We state only Capture's own capabilities as fact; confirm Suvoda's current offering with them.

Randomization without another system

Blinding and kits in the EDC. Free sandbox.

Compare it free in the sandbox