Suvoda is a specialist IRT. Capture runs randomization, blinding and kits inside the EDC. Tracing how a participant's allocation, kits and visit data flow through each setup shows which your study needs.
Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned
Tests
5
Hands-on
4
To confirm
1
Capture vs Suvoda: the short version
0
sales calls needed to start building
1
audit trail across EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization
Free
sandbox with every feature, no time limit
EU + US
hosting in Frankfurt or N. Virginia
The comparison
Pick one participant and follow them: screened and enrolled in the EDC, randomized in the IRT, kit assigned, visit data entered, kit returned. In a two-system setup, each step crosses the integration; mismatches such as a participant randomized in one system but missing in the other are a familiar monitoring finding.
In Capture the same participant is randomized at enrolment in the EDC, their allocation is logged in the audit trail, kits are dispensed under e-signature, and blinded users never see the arm. See the Suvoda alternatives guide for the supply-chain side of the decision.
What to compare
| Criterion | Why it matters | Capture |
|---|---|---|
| Randomization design | Balance and allocation concealment | Block randomization with stratification and enrolment caps |
| Blinding | Protecting the trial | Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, including in exports |
| Emergency unblinding | Participant safety | Available to investigators; approvals without revealing the arm; logged |
| Kit management | Dispensing and accountability | Kit dispensing under e-signature; accountability report and export |
| Data flow | Reconciliation effort | Allocation, kits and visit data in one participant record |
| Complex supply | Depots, forecasting, resupply | Map requirements; very complex supply may need a specialist IRT |
This table shows Capture's answers only. Ask Suvoda for theirs, and confirm current capabilities and terms directly with them.
Randomization
Set arms, block size, stratification factors and enrolment caps once at setup. Allocation happens at enrolment, the same way at every site, and is logged in the audit trail. An unblinded administrator owns the randomization and medication lists, and kits are dispensed under electronic signature.
1 of 2 kits confirmed
Blinding
Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, not even in the data behind the screen or in exports. Investigators keep emergency unblinding, and the study owner can approve an unblinding request without seeing the answer. Every allocation and unblinding is logged.
Study coordinator
Subject 01-004
Randomized · R-0012
KitK-10418
Arm columnNot sent
Unblinded administrator
Subject 01-004
Randomized · R-0012
KitK-10418
Arm columnA
Same subject, same screen. The arm never reaches blinded roles.
Try it as a blinded and an unblinded user.
Fit
Suvoda is often the right choice for complex global trials with many depots, forecasting, temperature-controlled supply and sophisticated resupply rules.
Capture fits studies with straightforward supply that want randomization, blinding and kit accountability without a second system to integrate.
One platform
Sites enter data on locked, approved forms with edit checks that raise queries at entry. Participants complete questionnaires on their own phones and sign eConsent with verified signatures. Randomization and kit management run in the same study, and everything shares one field-level audit trail.

Switching
Recreate the randomization design in Capture for new studies rather than moving live lists. Keep completed studies' allocation records with their original exports.
Before choosing, write down your supply requirements: depots, kit types, temperature control and resupply. If they are simple, randomization in the EDC is usually enough.
Evaluation
Blocks, strata and enrolment caps.
Screens and exports for blinded users.
Who can, and what is logged.
Dispensing, returns and reports.
Depots, temperature control and resupply rules.
Integration or the same system.
All comparisons
Every comparison uses the same approach: what to test, where each option fits, and Capture's own answers. See all of them on the comparisons hub at /compare.
For many studies, yes. Very complex global supply chains may still need a specialist IRT.
Yes. Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, and an unblinded administrator owns the lists.
Yes. Enrolment caps are part of the randomization setup.
Yes. The free sandbox includes every feature with sample data, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when you go live.
From public positioning and the criteria teams tell us matter. We state only Capture's own capabilities as fact; confirm Suvoda's current offering with them.
Blinding and kits in the EDC. Free sandbox.