Comparison · MedableUpdated September 29, 2026

Capture vs Medable: fully decentralized or hybrid-ready

Medable is built for decentralized trials. Most studies are hybrid: some visits at sites, some data from home. Capture covers the hybrid core, with remote consent, phone questionnaires and site EDC in one study.

  • Free sandbox, no sales call
  • EDC, ePRO, eConsent, randomization
  • Part 11-aligned controls

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Evaluation · Medable vs Capture

Tests

5

Hands-on

4

To confirm

1

  • Consent a test participant remotelySame test, both systems
  • Complete a diary on your own phoneSame test, both systems
  • Miss an entry and watch the remindersSame test, both systems
  • See participant data next to site dataSame test, both systems
  • Compare total cost for your studyAsk both vendors
Test both on your own protocol

Capture vs Medable: the short version

  • Medable offers a decentralized clinical trial platform, including eCOA, eConsent and telehealth capabilities.
  • Fully decentralized platforms cover remote visits, home health and direct-to-patient logistics.
  • Most studies use a few decentralized elements: remote consent, home questionnaires and diaries, with site visits for the rest.
  • Capture covers that hybrid core in one study; it does not provide video visits, which many teams run with existing telehealth tools.
  • List the decentralized elements your protocol needs before comparing.

0

sales calls needed to start building

1

audit trail across EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization

Free

sandbox with every feature, no time limit

EU + US

hosting in Frankfurt or N. Virginia

The comparison

Which decentralized elements does your protocol need?

Decentralized trials combine many elements: remote consent, telehealth visits, home nursing, direct-to-patient drug shipment, wearables and home questionnaires. Few studies need all of them. A platform built for full decentralization can be a good fit when many are needed; when only a few are, a hybrid-ready EDC can be simpler and cheaper.

Capture handles remote eConsent with verified signatures, questionnaires and diaries on participants' phones, visits that can be on-site, remote, home or hybrid, and all site data in one study. See the decentralized clinical trial guide and the DCT consent template.

What to compare

What to test when comparing Capture and Medable

CriterionWhy it mattersCapture
eConsentEvidence of consentEmail OTP, investigator countersignature, witness and LAR signatures, signed PDF
Device modelCost and participant frictionBYOD in the browser with no app; clinic devices supported
Visit typesHybrid schedulesVisits can be on-site, remote, home or hybrid
TelehealthVideo visitsNot provided; use your existing telehealth tools
Link to site dataReconciliation effortePRO, eConsent and EDC in one study and one audit trail
Commercial modelFit for your study sizeFree sandbox; no setup fee; pay only when you go live

This table shows Capture's answers only. Ask Medable for theirs, and confirm current capabilities and terms directly with them.

Participant data

ePRO on participants' own phones, in the same audit trail

Participants open a secure link with no app to install. Diaries and questionnaires follow the schedule with completion windows, and reminders go out when a task is due, the next day and before the window closes, respecting quiet hours in each participant's time zone. Compliance is visible by study, country and site.

  • BYOD in the browser, no app store.
  • Licence tracking for licensed instruments.
  • At-risk participants flagged.
ePRO software for clinical trials
ePRO compliance by site
Site 0194%
Site 0281%
Site 0358%

At-risk participants

03-0073 diary entries missedReminder delivered
03-011Week 4 questionnaire overdueEmail bounced

eConsent

Consent with evidence you can hand to an inspector

Participants sign on screen after confirming a one-time email code and acknowledging that the signature is legally binding. The investigator countersigns with password re-authentication. Witness and legally authorised representative signatures are supported, and each signature is linked to the exact document content.

  • Remote or in-clinic signing.
  • Signed PDF with audit trail.
  • Consent in the same study as the data.
eConsent software for clinical trials
Electronic signature

Meaning of signature

I have reviewed this adverse event and confirm the assessment of seriousness, severity and causality.

Signer

Dr. A. Ozola, PI

Password

••••••••••

Verified on the serverAutofill blockedSingle-use token
Sign

Walk through the participant journey

Consent and complete a diary on your own phone in the free sandbox.

Compare it free in the sandbox

Fit

When Medable fits, and when Capture does

Medable is often a strong fit for fully decentralized trials that need telehealth, home health coordination and extensive remote workflows from one platform.

Capture fits hybrid studies that need remote consent, home questionnaires and site EDC in one self-serve study.

One platform

EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization in one study

Sites enter data on locked, approved forms with edit checks that raise queries at entry. Participants complete questionnaires on their own phones and sign eConsent with verified signatures. Randomization and kit management run in the same study, and everything shares one field-level audit trail.

  • One participant record across every module.
  • No integrations to build or reconcile.
  • Phase 1 through Phase 3.
EDC for Phase 3 clinical trials
app.capture.study · Dashboard
Capture study dashboard with enrolment, compliance, safety overview and site risk monitor

Switching

Moving from Medable to Capture

Map each decentralized element in your protocol to a tool. Build consent, questionnaires and site forms in Capture, and keep telehealth or logistics providers where needed.

Switch at study boundaries rather than mid-study, especially for licensed instruments, whose electronic versions usually need the licence holder's approval in each new system.

Evaluation

How to evaluate patient-facing technology

Participant journey

Consent, onboarding and first questionnaire on a phone.

Device model

BYOD, provisioned devices or both.

Compliance tools

Windows, reminders and at-risk alerts.

Licensed instruments

Who migrates them and how licences are tracked.

Link to EDC

One audit trail or an integration.

Total cost

Build, per-participant and device costs.

All comparisons

Compare Capture with other platforms

Every comparison uses the same approach: what to test, where each option fits, and Capture's own answers. See all of them on the comparisons hub at /compare.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

Does Capture support decentralized trials?

Capture supports hybrid and decentralized elements such as remote eConsent and home questionnaires. It does not provide video visits.

Is Capture a Medable alternative?

For hybrid studies that mainly need remote consent, ePRO and EDC, yes.

Can participants consent remotely?

Yes, with a one-time email code and investigator countersignature.

Can I test Capture before deciding against Medable?

Yes. The free sandbox includes every feature with sample data, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when you go live.

How did you build this comparison?

From public positioning and the criteria teams tell us matter. We state only Capture's own capabilities as fact; confirm Medable's current offering with them.

Participant data in the same study as everything else

Free sandbox with every feature.

Compare it free in the sandbox