Comparison · YPrimeUpdated September 29, 2026

Capture vs YPrime: eCOA and IRT, with or without the EDC

YPrime combines eCOA and IRT for trials. Capture includes both, plus eConsent and EDC, in one study with one audit trail, so randomization, questionnaires and site data never need reconciling.

  • Free sandbox, no sales call
  • EDC, ePRO, eConsent, randomization
  • Part 11-aligned controls

Free sandbox · No credit card · 21 CFR Part 11 aligned

Evaluation · YPrime vs Capture

Tests

5

Hands-on

4

To confirm

1

  • Consent a test participant remotelySame test, both systems
  • Complete a diary on your own phoneSame test, both systems
  • Miss an entry and watch the remindersSame test, both systems
  • See participant data next to site dataSame test, both systems
  • Compare total cost for your studyAsk both vendors
Test both on your own protocol

Capture vs YPrime: the short version

  • YPrime offers eCOA, IRT and eConsent technology for clinical trials.
  • Combining eCOA and IRT with one vendor removes one integration; adding EDC to the same system removes the rest.
  • In Capture, randomization, kits, questionnaires, consent and site forms share one participant record.
  • Capture's randomization supports stratification, enrolment caps and blinded roles; kits are dispensed under e-signature.
  • For complex global supply chains, confirm supply management needs with each vendor.

0

sales calls needed to start building

1

audit trail across EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization

Free

sandbox with every feature, no time limit

EU + US

hosting in Frankfurt or N. Virginia

The comparison

Counting the integrations

A typical study might use one vendor for eCOA and IRT and another for EDC. Every participant then exists in two systems, with allocation, dispensing and questionnaire data flowing between them. The integration has to be specified, built, tested and monitored, and it is often the source of reconciliation queries.

Capture puts all of it in one study. The participant is randomized at enrolment, receives kits recorded under e-signature, and completes questionnaires on their phone, all in the same casebook and audit trail. See RTSM software for clinical trials.

What to compare

What to test when comparing Capture and YPrime

CriterionWhy it mattersCapture
Link to site dataReconciliation effortePRO, eConsent and EDC in one study and one audit trail
Randomization designBalance and allocation concealmentBlock randomization with stratification and enrolment caps
Kit managementDispensing and accountabilityKit dispensing under e-signature; accountability report and export
Device modelCost and participant frictionBYOD in the browser with no app; clinic devices supported
eConsentEvidence of consentEmail OTP, investigator countersignature, witness and LAR signatures, signed PDF
Commercial modelFit for your study sizeFree sandbox; no setup fee; pay only when you go live

This table shows Capture's answers only. Ask YPrime for theirs, and confirm current capabilities and terms directly with them.

Participant data

ePRO on participants' own phones, in the same audit trail

Participants open a secure link with no app to install. Diaries and questionnaires follow the schedule with completion windows, and reminders go out when a task is due, the next day and before the window closes, respecting quiet hours in each participant's time zone. Compliance is visible by study, country and site.

  • BYOD in the browser, no app store.
  • Licence tracking for licensed instruments.
  • At-risk participants flagged.
ePRO software for clinical trials
ePRO compliance by site
Site 0194%
Site 0281%
Site 0358%

At-risk participants

03-0073 diary entries missedReminder delivered
03-011Week 4 questionnaire overdueEmail bounced

eConsent

Consent with evidence you can hand to an inspector

Participants sign on screen after confirming a one-time email code and acknowledging that the signature is legally binding. The investigator countersigns with password re-authentication. Witness and legally authorised representative signatures are supported, and each signature is linked to the exact document content.

  • Remote or in-clinic signing.
  • Signed PDF with audit trail.
  • Consent in the same study as the data.
eConsent software for clinical trials
Electronic signature

Meaning of signature

I have reviewed this adverse event and confirm the assessment of seriousness, severity and causality.

Signer

Dr. A. Ozola, PI

Password

••••••••••

Verified on the serverAutofill blockedSingle-use token
Sign

Walk through the participant journey

Consent and complete a diary on your own phone in the free sandbox.

Compare it free in the sandbox

Fit

When YPrime fits, and when Capture does

YPrime is often a good fit for sponsors that want specialist eCOA and IRT with managed delivery, particularly in larger or more complex supply scenarios.

Capture fits studies that want eCOA, randomization, eConsent and EDC in one self-serve system, with no integration to build.

One platform

EDC, ePRO, eConsent and randomization in one study

Sites enter data on locked, approved forms with edit checks that raise queries at entry. Participants complete questionnaires on their own phones and sign eConsent with verified signatures. Randomization and kit management run in the same study, and everything shares one field-level audit trail.

  • One participant record across every module.
  • No integrations to build or reconcile.
  • Phase 1 through Phase 3.
EDC for Phase 3 clinical trials
app.capture.study · Dashboard
Capture study dashboard with enrolment, compliance, safety overview and site risk monitor

Switching

Moving from YPrime to Capture

Recreate the randomization design in the new study rather than migrating a live list, and rebuild questionnaires with licence details recorded.

Switch at study boundaries rather than mid-study, especially for licensed instruments, whose electronic versions usually need the licence holder's approval in each new system.

Evaluation

How to evaluate patient-facing technology

Participant journey

Consent, onboarding and first questionnaire on a phone.

Device model

BYOD, provisioned devices or both.

Compliance tools

Windows, reminders and at-risk alerts.

Licensed instruments

Who migrates them and how licences are tracked.

Link to EDC

One audit trail or an integration.

Total cost

Build, per-participant and device costs.

All comparisons

Compare Capture with other platforms

Every comparison uses the same approach: what to test, where each option fits, and Capture's own answers. See all of them on the comparisons hub at /compare.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they switch

Something not covered here? Ask us directly.

Is Capture a YPrime alternative?

Yes, for studies that want eCOA, randomization and eConsent in the same system as EDC.

Does Capture include IRT?

Capture includes randomization with stratification and caps, blinded roles and kit dispensing, inside the EDC.

Can blinded users see allocations?

No. Blinded roles never receive the treatment arm, including in exports.

Can I test Capture before deciding against YPrime?

Yes. The free sandbox includes every feature with sample data, no credit card and no time limit. You pay only when you go live.

How did you build this comparison?

From public positioning and the criteria teams tell us matter. We state only Capture's own capabilities as fact; confirm YPrime's current offering with them.

Participant data in the same study as everything else

Free sandbox with every feature.

Compare it free in the sandbox